HSTAM 215 A
Week 2
Skip To Content
Dashboard
  • Login
  • Dashboard
  • Calendar
  • Inbox
  • History
  • Help
Close
  • My Dashboard
  • HSTAM 215 A
  • Assignments
  • Week 2
Autumn 2024
  • Home
  • Syllabus
  • Assignments
  • Quizzes
  • Files
  • Pages
  • UW Libraries
  • Panopto Recordings
  • UW Resources

Week 2

  • Due Oct 3, 2024 by 11:59pm
  • Points 100
  • Submitting a file upload
  • Available until Oct 12, 2024 at 11:59pm
This assignment was locked Oct 12, 2024 at 11:59pm.

Writing Assignment:

There are two parts to this week’s assignment.

First, read the sample A paper and highlight the following components:

  • thesis statement in yellow
  • framing/historical context in red
  • topic sentences in green
  • evidence in blue
  • analysis in purple

If highlighting is problematic for you, you can label the parts of the paper. You will peer review these in section, so bring it to class with you on Friday in addition to submitting it online.

For the writing assignment proper, write 250-300 words on the following: According to Smith’s De republica Anglorum, how does a king differ from a tyrant? Can someone who came to the throne as a tyrant ever become a good king? Can someone who came to the throne legitimately ever become a tyrant? Does it seem permissible to get rid of a tyrant?

 

Answers should be 250-300 words and include specific details and page numbers from the reading.

Grading:

The purpose of these assignments is to demonstrate that you've done the reading and learned something from it. You should make sure to address all parts of the question and provide specifics like names, places, context, and page numbers in your answers.

For example, if you say that someone gave a speech before a battle, I'm going to want to know who gave the speech (names), which battle it was (context), and where it was (places). I also want to know what page(s) this material is on. Although these are short writing assignments, you still want to provide details (history is all about the details).

100% - addresses all parts of the question and provides details like names, places, context, and page numbers.

90% - addresses all parts of the question, but may lack some detail -OR- provides great detail but does not answer part of the question.

80% - answer is correct, but vague, one or more parts of the question may be unanswered.

70% - answer is very vague and multiple parts of the question are unanswered.

50% - I suspect that you read the source, but your answer totally lacks detail and doesn't demonstrate that you learned anything from the reading.

0% - It's clear that you didn't read the source, or you didn't turn in a writing assignment.

1728025199 10/03/2024 11:59pm
Please include a description
Additional Comments:
Rating max score to > pts
Please include a rating title

Rubric

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.  
Find a Rubric
Find Rubric
Please include a title
Title
You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
Title
Criteria Ratings Pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
Edit rating Delete rating
5 to >0 pts
Full Marks
blank
Edit rating Delete rating
0 to >0 pts
No Marks
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
  / 5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
Edit rating Delete rating
5 to >0 pts
Full Marks
blank
Edit rating Delete rating
0 to >0 pts
No Marks
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
  / 5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 5 out of 5