Rubric

Find Rubric
Keep in mind that 136 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Individual Interview Project Final Submission
Individual Interview Project Final Submission
Criteria Ratings Pts
Topic and Interviews
threshold: pts
10 to >8.33 pts
Capstone 4
Student clearly offers a holistic account of the experience of the interview collaborators that goes beyond their biomedical diagnosis; collaborator is presented in their individual complexity and is not eclipsed by their illness or medical condition (i.e. the account is not about the specific illness and treatments).
8.33 to >5.83 pts
Milestone 3
Student attempts to present aspects of their collaborators’ experiences but still relies too much on biomedical diagnosis and data or on specific form of healing.
5.83 to >3.33 pts
Milestone 2
Student's account of the collaborators' experiences is incomplete; the interview subject is presented almost exclusively in the context of their illness or biomedical diagnosis.
3.33 to >0 pts
Benchmark
Student relies exclusively on biomedical information or statistics about the illness discussed and provides almost no information about their collaborators from either a biomedical or holistic approach.
pts
10 pts
--
Integration of collaborators’ Voice
threshold: pts
5 to >3.57 pts
Capstone 4
Student adeptly uses a combination of direct quotes, summaries, or paraphrases to integrate the contents of their collaborators’ narrative into their overall paper.
3.57 to >2.14 pts
Milestone 3
Student uses some direct quotes and summaries, but the integration of the collaborators’ voice is still insufficient.
2.14 to >0.71 pts
Milestone 2
Student only refers to their collaborators’ narrative in very vague or unspecific terms.
0.71 to >0 pts
Benchmark
Students makes no appreciable effort to integrate their collaborators’ voice into their paper.
pts
5 pts
--
Research Inquiry
threshold: pts
10 to >7.14 pts
Capstone 4
Student articulates an argument or a main thesis regarding their collaborator's therapeutic journey.
7.14 to >4.29 pts
Milestone 3
Student articulates an argument but does so in confusing or unclear language.
4.29 to >1.43 pts
Milestone 2
Student states vague or generalized points or the narrative or presents a central idea that is underdeveloped and could be easily and succinctly answered without the research process.
1.43 to >0 pts
Benchmark
Student offers no explicit central idea to guide their narrative or provides one that is totally unintelligible.
pts
10 pts
--
Analysis
Students should refer to at least three (3) class concepts from the list provided and add scholarly sources (articles, book chapters) to their discussion.

Students are encouraged to use scholarly sources from class but they can also search for other materials at the library website.
threshold: pts
20 to >15.0 pts
Capstone 4
Student identifies specific patterns, categories, or relationships between the qualitative data (from interviews) and scholarly sources.
15 to >6.67 pts
Milestone 3
Student identifies patterns, categories, or relationships, but the connections drawn are sometimes unclear or vague.
6.67 to >1.67 pts
Milestone 3
Student provides analysis that is mostly cursory, over- generalized, or not explored in depth.
1.67 to >0 pts
Benchmark
Student makes no attempt to identify such patterns or relationships between data.
pts
20 pts
--
Organization
threshold: pts
10 to >7.14 pts
Capstone 4
The paper is organized with a logical and explicit pattern following the model provided.
7.14 to >4.29 pts
Milestone 3
The paper is mostly well- organized, but some paragraphs seem out of order or repetitive.
4.29 to >1.43 pts
Milestone 2
The narrative is confusingly organized and does not reflect an overall organizational pattern.
1.43 to >0 pts
Benchmark
The narrative is organized so confusingly that it impedes the author’s purpose.
pts
10 pts
--
Conclusions
threshold: pts
5 pts
Capstone 4
Student proves their point by using their observations and analysis to draw an overall conclusion that also gestures towards larger implications in the fields of medical anthropology and global health.
3 pts
Milestone 3
Student makes some effort prove their point and articulate the wider implications of their therapeutic journey narrative.
2 pts
Milestone 2
Student provides very cursory concluding statements that do not appear explicitly related to their argument.
1 pts
Benchmark
No conclusions or incomprehensible conclusions are offered.
pts
5 pts
--
Academic Integrity
Student submits their file as instructed and the similarity report is blue or green.
threshold: pts
0 pts
Full Marks
Turnitin shows a reasonable similarity percentage (blue or green)
0 pts
No Marks
Similarity reports that are not blue or green will be subject to further inquiry and if necessary reported to the UW.
pts
0 pts
--
Total Points: 60 out of 60