Course Syllabus
University of Washington · Summer 2026 · 5 Credits
POL S 324: Europe in World Politics
Course Syllabus
|
Instructor Dr. Travis Nelson |
|
Office Hours By appointment (online) |
Format Fully online, asynchronous |
Course Description
How did Europe remake itself after the catastrophe of World War II, and what does that transformation tell us about how states navigate power, identity, and crisis? This course examines the independent and coordinated efforts of Britain, France, and West Germany to adapt to the post-war global order; the creation and development of the Atlantic Alliance; Europe's relations with postcommunist states following the Cold War; decolonization and the evolution of European relations with the Global South; and the movement for European integration that produced the modern European Union. We conclude by applying these frameworks to contemporary crises — including Russia's invasion of Ukraine, NATO's renewed relevance, and the strains of democratic backsliding within the EU. This course is taught in an accelerated half-term format, covering the arc from 1945 to the present in five intensive weeks.
This class satisfies the University of Washington's Additional Writing (W) requirement. All students will complete a staged research paper that includes a draft, written instructor feedback, and a revised final submission, in addition to weekly discussion assignments and one exam.
Course-Level Learning Objectives
Upon successful completion of this course, students will be able to:
| 1. | Demonstrate an understanding of the historical development of Europe's role in world politics from 1945 to the present. |
| 2. | Identify and apply major theoretical frameworks in international relations — including realism, liberal institutionalism, and constructivism — to European cases. |
| 3. | Analyze the causes and consequences of European integration, including the development of NATO and the European Union. |
| 4. | Evaluate Europe's evolving relationships with postcommunist states, the Global South, and the United States. |
| 5. | Critically assess contemporary European security challenges, including the war in Ukraine and the future of transatlantic alliances. |
| 6. | Cultivate an awareness of the linkages between European and global political dynamics. |
| 7. | Construct and revise a sustained analytical argument in the conventions of political science writing, engaging scholarly literature and course frameworks. |
Grading
| Weekly Discussion Boards (5 boards + 5 news reaction posts) | 30% |
| Exam — Week 3 (short answer + essay, one hour) | 25% |
| Research Paper — Process (draft + post-draft reflection) | 10% |
| Research Paper — Final | 35% |
The exam covers Weeks 1–3 content. The research paper is a staged W assignment: all students submit a complete draft in Week 4, receive written feedback, and submit a revised final paper in Week 5. Papers must be 8 pages, double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman, cited in MLA or APA style. The full assignment description is posted separately on Canvas. Discussion boards are described below. Late submissions lose 5% per day.
I make every attempt to be fair, transparent, and consistent in grading. To request re-grading (outside of tabulation errors): (1) wait 24 hours and carefully review my comments; (2) email me a typed statement of no more than one page explaining why the grade should be changed, based on the substance of your work; (3) do so within one week of receiving the grade. I will re-evaluate if appropriate and respond within one week.
Important Dates
| Exam | Week 3 |
| Research Paper — W Draft | Week 4 — Friday 11:59pm |
| Post-Draft Reflection (Discussion Board) | Week 4 — Sunday 11:59pm |
| Research Paper — Final | Week 5 — Friday 11:59pm |
Letter Grade Distribution
| ≥ 95.00% | 4.0 | | | 80.00% | 3.0 | | | 66.00% | 1.8 |
| 94.00% | 3.9 | | | 79.00% | 2.9 | | | 64.00% | 1.7 |
| 93.00% | 3.8 | | | 78.00% | 2.8 | | | 62.00% | 1.6 |
| 91.00% | 3.7 | | | 77.00% | 2.7 | | | 60.00% | 1.5 |
| 89.00% | 3.6 | | | 76.00% | 2.6 | | | 58.00% | 1.4 |
| 87.00% | 3.5 | | | 75.00% | 2.5 | | | 56.00% | 1.3 |
| 85.00% | 3.4 | | | 74.00% | 2.4 | | | 54.00% | 1.2 |
| 83.00% | 3.3 | | | 73.00% | 2.3 | | | 52.00% | 1.1 |
| 82.00% | 3.2 | | | 72.00% | 2.2 | | | 50.00% | 1.0 |
| 81.00% | 3.1 | | | 71.00% | 2.1 | | | 49.00% | 0.7 |
| | | 70.00% | 2.0 | | | ≤ 48.00% | 0.0 |
Readings
There is no required textbook. All readings are provided as PDFs on Canvas or are freely available online. Most are academic journal articles accessible through UW Libraries. Complete readings before the relevant discussion board opens each week.
Course Discussions
Each week features one integrated discussion board and one news reaction post, both folded into the 30% discussion grade. Discussion boards combine engagement with course readings, connection to current events, and scaffolded development of your research paper argument. Initial posts are due by Thursday at 11:59pm; replies to at least two classmates are due by Sunday at 11:59pm. News reaction posts are due Sunday (Thursday in Week 4). Late submissions lose 5% per day.
| Week 1 | Framework Application — Identify a potential paper topic and explain which IR framework is most useful for analyzing it and why. Low-stakes and exploratory. |
| Week 2 | Institutional Analysis — Apply one of the week's readings on NATO or EU integration to your emerging paper topic. Take and briefly defend a position. |
| Week 3 | Source Check and Working Thesis — Post a working thesis and identify 2–3 sources. Peers respond with questions and pushback. Serves as informal pre-draft peer review. |
| Week 4 | Post-Draft Reflection — After submitting your W draft, describe your argument and identify what you found most difficult to support. Part of the process grade. |
| Week 5 | Contemporary Stakes — Connect your paper topic to a current development from Week 5 content. Use a news source no more than one week old. |
Tentative Course Outline
Readings
John Mearsheimer, “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War,” International Security 15(1), 1990, pp. 5–30
Geir Lundestad, “Empire by Invitation? The United States and Western Europe, 1945–1952,” Journal of Peace Research 23(3), 1986, pp. 263–277
Primary Source: George Kennan, The Long Telegram (1946) [freely available online]
Readings
Andrew Moravcsik, “Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach,” Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4), 1993, pp. 473–524
Celeste Wallander, “Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War,” International Organization 54(4), 2000, pp. 705–735
Readings
Mary Elise Sarotte, “Not One Inch Eastward? Bush, Baker, Kohl, Genscher, Gorbachev, and the Origin of Russian Resentment Toward NATO Enlargement,” Diplomatic History 34(1), 2010, pp. 119–140
Frederick Cooper, “Possibility and Constraint: African Independence in Historical Perspective,” Journal of African History 49(2), 2008, pp. 167–196
Readings
Matthijs, Matthias, and Mark Blyth. 2018. "When Is It Rational to Learn the Wrong Lessons? Technocratic Authority, Social Learning, and Euro Fragility
Sara Hobolt, “The Brexit Vote: A Divided Nation, a Divided Continent,” Journal of European Public Policy 23(9), 2016, pp. 1259–1277
Readings
Michael Kofman and Rob Lee, “Perseverance and Adaptation: Ukraine's Counteroffensive Operations in 2023,” War on the Rocks, 2023 [freely available online]
Hugo Meijer and Stephen G. Brooks, “Illusions of Autonomy: Why Europe Cannot Provide for Its Security If the United States Pulls Back,” International Security 45(4), 2021, pp. 7–43
Accommodations
If you are a student athlete or have a disability requiring accommodations, provide the relevant paperwork within a reasonable time frame — not the week before an exam. If a valid medical incident requires you to miss an assignment, I require documentation before accommodations are made; the sooner you make your request, the more likely accommodations will be granted.
If you have already established accommodations with Disability Resources for Students (DRS), communicate your approved accommodations to me as soon as possible. If you have not yet established services through DRS but have a temporary health condition or permanent disability requiring accommodations, contact DRS at 206-543-8924, email uwdrs@uw.edu, or visit disability.uw.edu.
Religious Accommodations: Washington state law requires that UW accommodate student absences due to reasons of faith or conscience, or for organized religious activities. Accommodations must be requested within the first two weeks of this course using the Religious Accommodations Request form. More information is available at the Religious Accommodations Policy.
Academic Honesty
Cheating and plagiarism will not be tolerated under any circumstances. A suspected instance of either may be immediately investigated and disciplinary actions may follow. Students are expected to uphold the standards set forth in the Student Rights, Freedoms, and Responsibilities Handbook.
Generative AI Policy: The use of generative AI tools (such as ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, or similar) to produce discussion posts, exam responses, or research paper text is not permitted and will be treated as academic dishonesty. This is not because these tools are unfamiliar or unimportant — they are neither — but because the core learning goals of this course require you to develop your own analytical voice and to practice the writing conventions of political science. Submitting AI-generated text cannot fulfill those goals, and it will not represent your thinking or your work. If you are uncertain whether a particular use of AI (such as grammar checking or brainstorming) is acceptable, ask me before submitting.
Course Summary:
| Date | Details | Due |
|---|---|---|